Rousseau and Lord of the Flies by William Golding - 598 Words

The lord of the Flies contains very fascinating views about society from Golding. In the book he demonstrates about what he thinks is true about society, which is that humans are naturally evil. In contrast, Rousseau shares his view in A Discourse on Inequality, which it shows that society makes people evil. I agree with Rousseau, I believe that humans are naturally good and it is society that makes us corrupt. Rousseau grew up in a time of peace and new ideas during 1712-1778. This greatly influenced his works and this clearly shows in his book. He believes that society has corrupted people and that we are naturally born pure. It is because of all the new desires that we forget about only surviving, but instead we also want new things and desires. In his book A Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, he states that the advances of their knowledge and learning are taking away from their morals and virtue. This was when he was a philosopher and at one point had wanted to become a priest. He lived in a much better time period than Golding. The new enlightenment had given him the idea that humans are naturally good. He believes that if humans were put in a natural setting, they would be nice and helpful to one another. Golding lived during World War I and World War II. This greatly influenced his writings as shown in The Lord of the Flies. Golding believes that humans are born evil. He believes it is necessary for society to keep humans under control. Without society and rules,Show MoreRelatedLord of the Flies by William Golding and the Philosophy of Rousseau704 Words   |  3 PagesRousseau and Golding are both philosophers and are both known for different similar topics. Rousseau is known for his first book, A Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, about his philosophies saying that man is good. Golding is known for his bestselling novel he ever wrote, Lord of The Flies, also expressing his philosophies saying that man is evil. Rousseau and Golding have many contrast s that fight against each other’s philosophies but was never spoken to each other because they lived in differentRead MoreLord of the Flies: William Golding and Jean Jacques Rousseau708 Words   |  3 PagesWilliam Golding and Jean Jacques Rousseau had very different points of view on society. Golding thought what all humans are born evil and that is what makes society horrible. Rousseau things the complete difference he thinks that all humans are born pure, nice, and innocent and that society is what corrupts humans. I agree with Rousseau because I don’t believe that all humans are born evil. This topic about these different views on society is what the book Lord of the Flies is about. The book writtenRead MoreLord of the Flies by William Golding and the Philosophy of Jean Jacques Rousseau547 Words   |  2 PagesRousseau and Golding, Two different men, from two different time periods, with two very different beliefs. Golding believed that everyone was born evil, and to keep people civilized, we need government and laws. Golding shows his beliefs through his book, The lord of the flies. Rousseau, on the other hand, believed that people were born good, and the only thing that corrupted children, was our societies social standards. Rousseau was a Swiss philosopher in the 18th century. He was also a writerRead MoreDiffering Views from William Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Lord of the Flies536 Words   |  2 PagesWilliam Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau had different views on humanity/society. Although they didn’t live in the same time period, their views have been compared to one another. William Golding’s views on humanity which were reflected in the book, â€Å"Lord of the Flies†, stated that all humans are naturally selfish, rude and greedy. Rousseau believed that all humans are naturally good and it was society that corrupted them. I agree more with Rousseau’s argument about human beings being naturallyRead MoreDifferent Views from William Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Lord of the Flies806 Words   |  3 PagesWilliam Golding, author of The Lord of the Flies, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau had very different views on human nature and civilization’s effect of humanity. While Golding believed that humans were inherently evil and that society and its rules were what kept humans in line and good, as reflected in The Lord of the Flies, Rousseau believed the opposite. He believed that humans were inherently good and that it was society and civilizations that corrupted man. For the most part, I agree with Golding’sRead MoreDifferent Beliefs from William Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Lord of the Flies587 Words   |  2 PagesWilliam Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau both have very different beliefs about a man’s naturalistic ability towards others including the society. Rousseau’s view is that a male being is pure, but later ruined by society and its entire entity. Golding’s belief is that a male always has an evil source and/or opening within them and the problem continues to get worse as time evolves. Golding also believes that without a strict series of rules a male being is mentally and naturalistically u nstableRead MorePhilosophy of Rouseau and Lord of the Flies by William Golding666 Words   |  3 PagesJean-Jacques Rousseau believed that people are inherently good. Without civilizations, humans are good beings with empathy, kindness, and well-developed morals. However, he believed that societies corrupt our morals and are what make the change in us to become â€Å"evil† or â€Å"bad†. The author of the novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding, however, believed that in a primitive environment, humans are evil. Without a society watching over us, humans will become barbaric brutes. Jean-Jacques Rousseau (born 1712)Read MoreJean-Jaques Rousseau and William Golding 730 Words   |  3 PagesJean-Jaques Rousseau and William Golding had very different beliefs on human nature. Rousseau Felt that all people are born good and that society is corrupt and corrupts humans. Yet Golding had very different views. Golding’s beliefs are that all humans are born with evil intent and that society is the very thing that keeps us from again becoming a primitive species. As you can see they obviously have very different views. But I happen to agree more with Rousseau’s beliefs more so than Golding’sRead MoreThe Nature of Humans in Lord of the Flies by William Golding651 Words   |  3 PagesThe nature of human: are humans born good or evil? These two opposing views on human nature are two topics that Rousseau and Golding have both touched upon. While Golding believes that humans are born inherently evil, Rousseau believes the opposite: that humans are inhere ntly good. Golding wrote the novel Lord of the Flies as a response of the novel, The Coral Island by R.M. Ballantyne because he believed that it was far-fetched. In this novel Ballantyne’s main characters are able to enjoy theirRead MoreLord of the Flies by William Golding835 Words   |  3 PagesThe Lord of The Flies, an amazing and controversial book written by William Golding does have some interesting views on society. If you look on the surface you see some kids who are doing what kids do and that is to be crazy and have fun. However, if you look deeper youll find the roots of Goldings beliefs on society and humanity as a whole. Its more of a pessimistic view. Theres also the view of Jean Jacques Rousseau, the author of Dissertation on the Origin and Foundation of the Inequality